The Art Monk Hall of Fame Campaign

June 6, 2006

Peter King, Art Monk, and 6-6-06

Filed under: News, Voter Articles — DjTj @ 2:26 pm

There is a poll on the SI.com NFL page with Michael Irvin vs. Art Monk for the Hall of Fame: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/

Here are the results.

This was because Peter King wrote in his mailbag today that he would reconsider his position on Art Monk.  I will temporarily move Peter King to the status of “Maybe No” while he tries to make up his mind…

-=-=-=-=-=-
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/peter_king/06/06/mmqbte/index.html
Sports Illustrated SI.com
Monday Morning Quarterback Tuesday Edition
What about these guys? Readers get chance to argue for their HOF candidates
Tuesday June 6, 2006
Peter King

Now on to other e-mails. And this is a big surprise: I got 16 million pieces of mail saying Art Monk should be in.

ART MONK TIME. From Steve Woods of Houston: “In response to your list of 10 players left out of the Hall of Fame, I have my own list (which I know you won’t agree with):

1) Art Monk.
2) Art Monk.
3) Art Monk.
4) Art Monk.

You get my drift, and yes, I am a biased die-hard ‘Skins fan. Monk had 940 career receptions, 12,000 career yards, with three Super Bowls rings. I think the presence of John Riggins on the goal line is a big reason why he didn’t have quite as many touchdowns as you would have thought, given his other stats, although he does have more than several receivers already in, such as Stallworth and Swann. The guy was a tremendous player, who, in my opinion, was the heart and soul of the offense for much of the ’80s. You can’t do any more than that. It sure does seem like you have some sort of bias against the ‘Skins, and Monk in particular, in recent years. I don’t understand that. Are you a Cowboys fan?!? Please say it isn’t so.”

Ain’t so. I’m a fan of no football team. You may be interested to know that I am going to rethink my position on Monk this year. I don’t want to be so stuck in the mud on this issue that I close my mind to the possibility that I’m wrong and that Monk really does belong. So I’m going to sit down with Joe Gibbs when I see the Redskins this summer and try to soak in what the Monk side believes I am missing. A lot of people I respect tell me I’m dead wrong on Monk — Len Shapiro, Mike Wilbon among them, plus quieter ones with close ties to the Hall. So I’ll rethink my position and let you know what I come up with.

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. I simply can’t understand that you have to talk to other people to help rethink your stance on Art Monk. Did you even watch the Redskins play in the 80’s and early 90’s? Did you even watch NFL games then? Seriously this fact alone, makes me wonder how you even get to write for Sports Illustrated.

    Comment by Jason Harter — January 12, 2007 @ 3:28 pm

  2. There is a long list of 39 voters in the voting for the Hall of Fame. I don’t feel that they are qualified to make that decision. The only people that should be allowed to vote are the current living members of the Hall of Fame. Who better to make that judgement than those who have actually PLAYED the game.

    Comment by Randy — February 4, 2007 @ 11:43 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: