The Art Monk Hall of Fame Campaign

February 1, 2008

Monk’s HOF omission a mystery

Filed under: News — DjTj @ 3:41 pm

Monk’s HOF omission a mystery
Yahoo! Sports
February 1, 2008
Jason Cole

PHOENIX … Bill Belichick essentially asked the question five times in the span of 10 minutes: What is the measure of a Hall of Famer?

What are the criteria?

What’s the definition?

By most measures he would consider, Washington Redskins receiver Art Monk should be one.

“What (Monk) did, he was really, really good at,” said the New England Patriots coach, who measures his praise as closely as a cartographer. More telling is that Belichick, a man who has great appreciation for the history of the game, took so much time to talk about Monk several weeks ago as his team was getting ready for the first round of the playoffs against the Jacksonville Jaguars.

“He has the numbers, the stats and he won … That was a very good offense he played on, an offense that transcended a lot of changes at quarterback. Yes, he had his role and he played it very well. So you have to ask, ‘What’s the criteria?’ ” Belichick said.

Of course, that’s one of the most difficult questions the 44 voters for the Pro Football Hall of Fame face. The group will gather Saturday morning to go over the 17 candidates for this year. The list eventually will be whittled to between four and seven elected for induction in August. The meeting lasts hours (not including the inevitable discussion beforehand) and often is heated.

But the debates have become pretty formulaic. Should there be more pass rushers inducted? Are defensive players in general overlooked, particularly with the recent explosion in offensive numbers since the 1980s?

Then there’s the ever-popular, inexact talking point: Was this player truly great?

Where Monk, a finalist for eight years, falls this year in the discussion should be very interesting. Last year, former Dallas Cowboys wide receiver Michael Irvin made the Hall of Fame despite the fact that some voters said they wouldn’t vote for him until Monk was elected.

Now, Monk has fellow wide receiver Cris Carter, who caught 1,101 passes in his career and scored 130 touchdowns (Monk had 68) also eligible. Carter also remains front and center in the football world because of he’s an analyst with HBO and Yahoo! Sports. Beyond Carter, there are Washington teammates Darrell Green, a superlative cornerback, and Russ Grimm, an anchor of the team’s famous offensive line.

The other candidates this year are: Former NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue, wide receiver Andre Reed, guards Bob Kuechenberg and Randall McDaniel, offensive tackle Gary Zimmerman, punter Ray Guy, linebackers Derrick Thomas, Andre Tippett and Randy Gradishar, defensive ends Fred Dean and Richard Dent, running back Marshall Goldberg and cornerback Emmitt Thomas.

What Monk decidedly lacks is sex appeal as a player. There are no dramatic Super Bowl performances, such as those turned in by current Hall of Famers Lynn Swann and John Stallworth. There isn’t the blazing speed of James Lofton or the overwhelming stats (at least for their eras) of Steve Largent and Charlie Joiner. Monk was a Pro Bowler only three times in his 16-year career.

By any other measure, Monk is pretty much the equal of all of them. He finished his career as the leading receiver of all time with 940 catches, although he was quickly passed by Jerry Rice. He was the first receiver to ever catch 100 passes in a season, laying the groundwork for so many other receivers to do the same.

In the playoffs, Monk’s numbers are almost identical to Largent, Joiner, Swann, Stallworth and Lofton. In fact, he averaged more catches per game in the playoffs than all of them and more yards per game than all but one. Finally, he has more Super Bowl rings than Lofton, Largent and Joiner combined, and as many Super Bowl appearances as both Swann and Stallworth (Monk was with the Redskins for Super Bowl XVII but missed the game because of injury).

And isn’t that really the point of why the game is played?

“I don’t really understand the process, but I played against the man twice a year for a long time and he was big and tough and strong,” said Baltimore Ravens secondary coach Dennis Thurman, who faced Monk for seven years in the NFL. “You had to account for Art Monk. He has the numbers, he has the championships. He was consistent for a long time. To me, that’s a Hall of Famer.”

Said Jacksonville assistant head coach Mike Tice, who coached Carter and played against Monk: “Cris Carter is a great friend of mine. He deserves to be in the Hall of Fame and he’s going to get there someday. But Art Monk has been passed over for too long.”

Monk was also a prototype teammate, a guy who quietly did his job, demanding little or no fanfare. He led by deed rather than word.

“When I got there, Art had already been in the league for five or six years,” said former Redskins running back Earnest Byner, now a coach with the team. “But here he was in meetings, taking notes like he was still a first-year guy. He was just a great leader.”

Said quarterback Doug Williams: “I think I saw Art say something maybe twice in a game and that was when he got mad at the other team. He never complained on the sideline or called for the ball in the huddle. Never came back and said, ‘Man, I was open.’ He just did his job and he did it great.”

Williams makes another great point in relation to Monk. His accomplishments were achieved with a steady rotation of quarterbacks (Williams, Joe Theismann, Mark Rypien and Jay Schroeder were the primary passers during Monk’s career).

“Jerry Rice was great, but he had either Joe Montana or Steve Young almost all his career. He was always working with the same guys. Art was the same productive player no matter what,” Williams said.

That degree of difficulty hasn’t always meant much to some of the voters. Long-time Sports Illustrated writer Paul Zimmerman has said of Monk’s career on many an occasion that “catching 800 eight-yard hooks just doesn’t do it for me.” Zimmerman’s opinion was that only classic deep-threat receivers deserved Hall consideration.

Then again, Zimmerman admitted last summer that his view may be changing. Proof of that came earlier this month when Zimmerman named his 2007 All-Pro team. The three receivers he named were Randy Moss, Reggie Wayne and Wes Welker. While Moss and Wayne are class big-play receivers, Welker is the definition of a possession receiver, as he caught 112 passes for 1,175 yards – a scant 10.5 yards per catch.

Of course, what Welker did was plenty good enough for Belichick and the Patriots.

Just like it was for Monk and the Redskins.

Monk’s time for Hall of Fame has come
February 1, 2008
Mike Celizic

Washington wide receiver’s omission defies every rule of logic.

PHOENIX – Can we put Art Monk in the Hall of Fame already? Please? And while you’re at it, oh high and exalted committee of electors, how about putting Darrell Green in with him when you make your selections Saturday? They were the key parts of a dynasty, the best of their era. They belong.

Green should be a no-brainer, but given the Byzantine machinations of the selection committee, there’s no such thing as a shoe-in with the Hall. In that, it’s similar to baseball’s Hall of Fame, whose would-be members are held hostage by the whims of more than 500 baseball writers.

* * *

Monk retired with the NFL’s all-time record for receptions. He’s since dropped to sixth place on the list, which is headed by Jerry Rice, but all Monk could do was break the record that existed in his day. To keep him out because subsequent receivers were better is like saying Babe Ruth doesn’t belong in baseball Hal of Fame because Hank Aaron broke his record for home runs.

Monk won three Super Bowls on those Joe Gibbs dynasty teams. Gibbs remains the only coach to win three championships with three different quarterbacks. But all of them had the same primary target — the redoubtable Mr. Monk.

The receiver was also named to the NFL All-1980s team. If a player is recognized as the best at his position for an entire decade, it’s impossible to say he’s not Hall of Fame material. That’s what the Hall is about: enshrining the best of every era. To say the best receiver of an entire decade is not also an all-time great is incomprehensible.

* * *

Those Redskin teams won three Super Bowls and gave us the most famous offensive line in NFL history — the Hogs. (The most famous offensive line is kind of like being the most popular dental procedure, but it’s something.) And yet only one player from those teams is in the Hall – John Riggins, the Mohawk-coifed running back whose most memorable accomplishment took place not on the football field but at a White House dinner, where, after imbibing one — or seven — too many libations, Riggins told Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor to “lighten up, Sandy baby.”

The team’s coach, Joe Gibbs is also in the Hall. But no one else.

That’s just wrong. A team wins three Super Bowls, it has some great players on it. And none were greater than Green, who retired with 54 interceptions and is on the NFL All-1990s team, and Monk.

Russ Grimm, one of the Hogs, is also up for selection this year, but it would be asking too much to have all three ‘Skins go in together. It’s possible that the voters will decide to overlook Green, too, if only because it’s his first year of eligibility. It would be hard to imagine, but stranger things have happened.

Most important is that Art Monk, who retired as the most prolific receiver ever, take his place in the shrine where he belongs. He’s waited eight years, which is eight too many. Elect him, folks. Now.


  1. I don’t trust the predictions of Peter King and Dr. Z saying that they think Monk will get in. I hope they’re right, but I think they are covering their tracks so they don’t get the blame for it if he doesn’t get in. I called a radio show the other day and the host said there should be a “Congressional Investigation.” Of course he was exaggerating, but I’m thinking that maybe there should be an actual congressional investigation. Congress is taking sports seriously, with the Mitchell Report and now Arlen Specter’s investigation of the Patriots’ Spygate. I talked to at least one lawyer who thinks it would be “very interesting” to investigate the HOF voting. If Monk has the stats, the championships, the intangibles, the testimonials from HOFers and players and coaches he played against, if the Skins last two Super Bowl winning teams don’t have one HOFer, there may be some collusion and/or fraud involved.

    Comment by Mike Frandsen — February 1, 2008 @ 5:07 pm

  2. There are just too many players deserving of enshrinement to the HOF for the voters to take less than the maximum every year. How do you use statistics to evaluate an offensive lineman? Look what happened to Rayfield Wright. He was elected as a Senior candidate, when he should have been put into the HOF long ago.

    Every team in the league has some ‘Best Ever” players and they should be evaluated as to whether or not they deserve a spot. Some type of overhaul to the system is what is needed. A two day HOF affair to allow additional enshrinements (twice or more as many than now) over a long weekend with TWO HOF games (one on Sat, one on Sun) every year is needed to get these deserving guys in that have earned it. There could be something more done every 10 years to add additional senior players in, like having a “Senior Group” of 5-10 additional players added to catch the older deserving players before they die. There are a lot of Throwback players that should be considered immediately before they’re gone. As a Redskins fan, Pat Fischer is a great example. He’s tied for 10th on the all time list for interceptions and was a ferocious hitter, unlike potential first time HOFer Dione Sanders. He invented and perfected the bump and run. Every DB with 50 plus interceptions are either in the HOF or are being considered at this point. Fischer and old timers like him are being further and further left behind for the likes of more QB’s, RB’s and WR’s. Many voters that would accept him into the HOF, however, say there are more deserving candidates upcoming. Which brings us back to Art Monk.

    Even though Monk is in the ‘stats’ class of players and abosolutely has HOF career stats, he would already be in if voters could choose simply on his career work, instead of whom he happens to be up against ever year. If the HOF wants to be a representative of the greatest players of all time, they will have to include players like Monk. His peers have agreed and are in disbelief that he isn’t already in. How can a sports writer argue against someone that strapped up against the man and say they know better than his opponents or teammates?

    I hate to see Monk’s enshrinement become a “Senior” Choice one day. Something needs to be done, because more and more years go by and more and more players like MONK and FISCHER are being past by in the vote simply because there are first and second year eligible enshrinements filling the only remaining spots. Getting into the HOF should be about a man’s career, not about whom he is going up against that year in the voting. Take the arguement that ‘we only have so many spaces’ out of the equation. In the mean time, Monk is the man to select as one of the many deserving guys this year. It’s his turn in 2008…

    Comment by Roy Shields — February 1, 2008 @ 6:32 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: